GRE ANALYTICAL WRITING

Each essay receives a score from two readers which would use the six-point rating scale. The primary focus to attain extraordinarily well in Analytical Writing measure is your critical thinking and analytical writing skills instead of grammar, sentence and mechanics.
• Text that is substantially and more similar to that found in one or more other test essay responses
• Quoting without attribution, paraphrasing without language that appears in published and unpublished sources
• Unacknowledged use of work that has been produced by associating with others without the use of citation of the contribution of those articles written.
• Essays which are submitted by the examinee when the words have, in fact, been borrowed or taken from elsewhere or prepared by another person.
Analyze an Issue Task
• Analysis of a dragging task assesses your ability to think critically about the topic of general interest and to obviously express your thoughts about it in writing. Every Issue topic presents a claim where test-takers discuss from different perspectives and apply to many different situations or conditions.
• Write a response where you would discuss the extent to which you may agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. When you develop and support your position, you’d need to consider ways during which the statement won’t within the least times be true and explain how these considerations would shape your position.
• Write a response wherein you discuss the extent to which you may agree or disagree with the recommendations and explain very clearly your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances during which adopting the recommendations would or wouldn’t be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
• Write a response during which you discuss the extent to which you agree or afflict the claim. In developing and supporting your position, make certain to deal with the foremost compelling reason and/or examples that would be used wisely to challenge your position.
• Write a response during which you ask absolute clarity which views more closely aligns together with your own view and explain your reasoning very clearly for the position you take in developing and supporting the same. Make sure that you have to address both the views you presented.
Preparing for the Issue Task
Since the Issue task is only meant to assess the persuasive writing skills you have developed throughout your education in school and college, it has been designed to neither require any particular course of study nor to advantage students with a specific sort of training. The college textbooks on an outsized scale offer composition are advice on persuasive writing and argumentation that you simply would find useful, but even this recommendation is more technical and specialized than you would like for the difficult task. You are not expected to know specific critical thinking or writing terms or strategies; instead, you should be able to respond to the specific instructions and use reasons, evidence, and examples to support your position on the given issue.
For instance, in a problem topic that might ask you to think about a policy which might require the government’s support for art museums and therefore the very number of implications of implementing the policy. If your view or position is that the government should fund art museums, you may support your position by discussing the reasons for art which is important, and explain what government funding would make in order to access the museums available to everyone.
In the Issue task, you may find it helpful to ask yourself the following questions:
• What precisely is/was the central issue?
• What precisely are the instructions that are asking me to prompt responses?
• Do I agree with all the claims put forth or any part of a claim?
• Why or why not?
• Does the claim put forth really make certain assumptions? If so, do you need to state whether they are reasonable?
• Is the claim valid only under some conditions? If so, what are they, you need to specify?
• Do I even have to elucidate how I interpret certain terms or concepts utilized in the claim?
• If I take a certain position on the issue, Should I explain the reasons to support my position?
• What examples—either in real or hypothetical – could I use to illustrate the reasons and advance my point of view? Which examples according to the passage are the most compelling?